Penerapan Decision tree dalam pengambilan keputusan untuk pemain Texas Holdem Poker
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441//fifo.2020.v12i2.006Keywords:
Tree, Poker, Probability, Gambler’s FallacyAbstract
Abstract
Texas holdem poker is a popular poker game. This game is played by millions of people every day, both to find additional income or just for fun. But in fact not everyone who plays poker with these goals gets according to what they have planned. Some people actually experience losses after playing. They unconsciously develop the logic of gambler's fallacy that causes them to play poker without using strategy. This research made a system that can prove the defect of gambler's fallacy and made a tool for playing poker. The processed dataset is a dataset containing information of cards used in poker and their probability of occurrence. The method used in this research are iterative deepening search tree and decision tree. The main results of this research is a tool that can provide insight as a basis for decision making. However, this tool has not been able to prove its capabilities in helping to increase the winning percentage, so that further study is needed. In addition, this study also shows that playing with gambler's fallacy logic only gives 48.13% wins of 6,000 trials. These results proved that using gambler's fallacy logic in playing poker is a mistake.
Keywords – Tree, Poker, Probability, Gambler’s Fallacy
Abstrak
Texas holdem poker merupakan permainan poker yang populer. Permainan ini dimainkan oleh jutaan orang setiap harinya, baik untuk mencari penghasilan tambahan ataupun hanya untuk bersenang-senang. Namun pada kenyataanya tidak semua orang yang bermain poker dengan tujuan tersebut mendapatkan sesuai dengan apa yang mereka rencanakan. Sebagian orang justru mengalami kerugian pasca bermain. Mereka tanpa sadar mengembangkan logika berpikir gambler’s fallacy yang mengakibatkan bermain tanpa strategi. Makalah ini menyajikan hasil studi penerapan pohon keputusan dan pohon pencarian untuk membuktikan kecacatan gambler’s fallacy dan membantu dalam bermain poker. Dataset yang diolah adalah dataset yang berisi informasi kartu-kartu yang dipakai dalam permainan serta probabilitas kemunculannya. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah metode pencarian pada struktur tree dan metode pohon keputusan. Hasil utama dari penelitian ini adalah alat bantu yang mampu memberikan insight sebagai dasar pengambilan keputusan. Namun, alat bantu ini belum bisa dibuktikan kapabilitasnya dalam membantu menaikkan persentase kemenangan sehingga diperlukan studi lanjutan. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa bermain dengan logika gambler’s fallacy hanya memberikan 48.13% kemenangan dari 6000 percobaan. Hasil tersebut membuktikan bahwa menggunakan logika gambler’s fallacy dalam bermain poker merupakan suatu kesalahan.
Kata kunci – Tree, Poker, Probabilitas, Gambler’s Fallacy
Downloads
References
G. Meyer, M. von Meduna, T. Brosowski, and T. Hayer, “Is Poker a Game of Skill or Chance? A Quasi-Experimental Study,” J. Gambl. Stud., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 535–550, 2013.
V. Berthet, “Best Hand Wins: How Poker Is Governed by Chance,” Chance, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 34–38, 2015.
C. A. Leonard and R. J. Williams, “Characteristics of good poker players,” J. Gambl. Issues, vol. 2015, no. 31, pp. 44–67, 2015.
G. Bouju, M. Grall-Bronnec, V. Quistrebert-Davanne, J. B. Hardouin, and J. L. Vénisse, “Texas hold’em poker: A qualitative analysis of gamblers’ perceptions,” J. Gambl. Issues, no. 28, 2013.
C. Ly, “An Exploratory Investigation of Online Gambling Amongst University Students in Tasmania,” Dhhs.Clients.Squiz.Net, pp. 1–51, 2010.
H. Kesuma, “Jual Beli Chip Poker Secara Online Perspektif Konsep Jual Beli Madzhab Syafi’i,” Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, 2018.
D. Trijayanto, “Media Baru dan Ekonomi Baru Lahirnya Sistem Ekonomi Baru dalam Game Online Zynga Poker,” PROMEDIA, vol. I, no. 1, pp. 19–42, 2015.
O. N. Talberg, “Can we expect more students dropping out of education to play poker or has online poker become too challenging?,” J. Gambl. Issues, vol. 2017, no. 37, pp. 59–86, 2017.
T. Apriani, “FENOMENA JUDI POKER ONLINE DIKALANGAN MAHASISWA UNIVERSITAS RIAU JURUSAN SOSIOLOGI,” Jom Fisip, vol. 5, p. 3, 2018.
M. Morav et al., “DeepStack : Expert-Level Artificial Intelligence in No-Limit Poker,” Science (80-. )., vol. 513, no. May, pp. 1–32, 2017.
N. Brown and T. Sandholm, “Superhuman AI for heads-up no-limit poker: Libratus beats top professionals,” Science (80-. )., vol. 359, no. 6374, pp. 418–424, 2018.
R. Biolcati, S. Passini, and M. D. Griffiths, “All-in and bad beat: Professional poker players and pathological gambling,” Int. J. Ment. Health Addict., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 2015.
“Poker Rules | Discover the Rules of the Game and Win at PokerStars.” [Online]. Available: https://www.pokerstars.com/poker/games/rules/. [Accessed: 16-Jun-2019].
“How to Play Texas Hold’em | Texas Holdem Rules,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.pokerlistings.com/poker-rules-texas-holdem. [Accessed: 16-Jun-2019].
M. G. Carneiro and G. A. De Lisboa, “What’s the Next Move? Learning Player Strategies in Zoom Poker Games,” 2018 IEEE Congr. Evol. Comput. CEC 2018 - Proc., pp. 1–8, 2018.
F. de Mesentier Silva, J. Togelius, F. Lantz, and A. Nealen, “Generating beginner heuristics for simple texas hold’em,” pp. 181–188, 2018.
S. Ganzfried and F. Yusuf, “Computing Human-Understandable Strategies: Deducing Fundamental Rules of Poker Strategy,” Games, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 49, 2017.
C.R.Kothari.”Research Methology Methods and Techniques”. India: New Age International Limited. ISBN (13) : 978-81-224-2488-1. 2004.
Gorunescu, F. ”Data Mining Concept Model and Techniques. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-19720-8. 2011
Andriani Anik. ”Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Berbasis Decision Tree dalam Pemberian Beasiswa Studi Kasus: AMIK ”BSI YOGYAKARTA”. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi., 2013., pp. 163-168.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that this paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above-mentioned paper as a whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
Our Articles are licensed under CC BY-NC
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
