The Effect of Firm Size, Profitability and Leverage on Corporate Social Responsibility (Case Study on Jakarta Islamic Index, 2016-2020)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22441/indikator.v6i3.15409

Keywords:

Firm size, Profitability, ROA, Leverage, DER, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Jakarta Islamic Index

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of firm size, profitability (ROA) and leverage (DER) on corporate social responsibility. The population in this study are companies registered as members of the Jakarta Islamic Index in 2016-2020. Of the 30 listed companies, there are 11 companies that meet the criteria as samples in this study. Sampling was done by purposive sampling method, using panel data. The method of data collection was carried out using documentation techniques and library research techniques with data sources namely secondary data. The data analysis method uses statistical techniques through Eviews 9. This study proves that the size of the company has a negative and insignificant effect on the disclosure of corporate social responsibility. ROA has a significant negative effect on the disclosure of corporate social responsibility.

Author Biography

Asep Risman, Universitas Mercu Buana

Scopus Author ID: 57195431440

Scopus Author ID: 57222611206

References

BBC. (2010). Global Trend Graphs, “Planet under Pressure”. Accessed from:https://www.bbc.com. On September 6, 2021.

Chariri, A., & Ghozali, I. (2007). Accounting Theory. Diponegoro University, Semarang.

Deegan, C. (2002). The Legitimizing Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosure - A Theoritical Foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3).

Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51.

Global Reporting Initiative. (2019). About Sustainability Reporting. Accessed from:https://www.globalreporting.org/information/sustainabilityreporting/Pages/default.aspx. On August 22, 2021.

Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.

Indonesia stock exchange. (2021). Annual finance report. Accessed fromhttps://www.idx.co.id. On April 20, 2021.

Jensen, M., C., and W. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Finance Economics, 3:35-360.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment.

Makmun. (2002). Government Insurance Performance Efficiency. Economic and Financial Studies, 6 No. 1, 81–98.

Putro, D., & Risman, A. (2021). The Effect of Capital Structure and Liquidity on Firm Value Mediated by Profitability. The Euraseans: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, (2(27), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.35678/2539-5645.2(27).2021.26-34.

Risman, A., Parwoto & Sulaeman, A., (2020). The Mediating Role of Firm’s Performance on The Relationship between Free Cash Flow and Capital Structure, Psychology and Education Journal, Vol. 58 No. 1: 1209-1216.

Umar, H. (2003). Research methods. Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

WBCSD. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Meeting Changing Expectations. Accessed from:http://www.wbcsd.org/DocRoot/hbdf19Txhmk3kDxBQDWW/CSRmeeting.pdf (On October 4, 2021).

Published

2022-08-01

How to Cite

Aristananda, A., & Risman, A. (2022). The Effect of Firm Size, Profitability and Leverage on Corporate Social Responsibility (Case Study on Jakarta Islamic Index, 2016-2020). Indikator: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 6(3), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.22441/indikator.v6i3.15409

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.