ERM Implementation and Non-Performing Loans Performance: Comparison between Islamic Bank and Conventional Bank
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441/jiess.2020.v1i2.001Keywords:
Enterprise Risk Management, Non-performing Loan, Islamic Banking, Conventional BankingAbstract
There are different characteristics between islamic banking and conventional banking that cause a variety of questions, including the implementation of ERM. This study focuses on the effect of ERM implementation on NPL performance of banking, If the implementation of ERM is good, so the performance of NPL will also better. This study investigate the effect of ERM implementation on NPL performance on islamic banking and conventional banking. This study also investigate a different test level of ERM implementation that affect NPL on each type of banking. The sample consisted of 30 conventional banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange and 10 Islamic banking based on the Islamic Banking Statistics that issued by Bank Indonesia for the 2011-2016 research period. This study find that the implementation of ERM has a significant negative effect both on the islamic banking and on conventional banking. While the results of different tests conducted show that the implementation of ERM to NPL has more influence on conventional banking than in islamic banking, this could be due to the maturity level of both types of banks. Conventional banking has also existed for a long time compared to Islamic, so it certainly has a functioning structure efficiently, but for Islamic banking still requires effort and improvement for further development.
Downloads
References
(Voiculescu), C.-I. Z. (2016). Measuring the Value of Internal Audit in the Banking Industry. The Audit Financiar Journal, 14(141), 1009–1009.
Abdel Megeid, N. S. (2017). Liquidity Risk Management: Conventional Versus Islamic Banking System in Egypt. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 8(1), 100–128.
Abdolmohammadi, M. J. (2012). Chief Audit Executives’ Assessment of Internal Auditors’ Performance Attributes by Professional Rank and Cultural Cluster. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 24(1), 1–23.
Abedifar, P., Molyneux, P., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Risk in Islamic Banking. Review of Finance, 17(6), 2035–2096.
Agista, G. G., & Mimba, N. P. S. H. (2017). Pengaruh Corporate Governance Structure Dan Konsentrasi Kepemilikan Pada Pengungkapan Enterprise Risk Management. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 20(1), 438–466.
Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Merrouche, O. (2010). Islamic vs. Conventional Banking: Business Model, Efficiency and Stability.
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2010). Manajemen Keuangan Edisi Kedelapan. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Bromiley, P., McShane, M., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. (2015). Enterprise Risk Management: Review, Critique, and Research Directions. Long Range Planning, 48(4), 265–276.
Chen, H. J., & Lin, K. T. (2016). How do Banks Make the Trade-offs among Risks?The Role ofCorporate Governance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 72(November), S39–S69.
Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are Family Firms More Tax Aggressive than Non-Family Firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61.
Čihák, M., & Hesse, H. (2010). Islamic Banks and Financial Stability: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Services Research, 38(August), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-010-0089-0
Haneef, S., Riaz, T., Ramzan, M., Rana, M. A., Ishaq, H. M., & Karim, Y. (2012). Impact of Risk Management on Non-performing Loans and Profitability of Banking Sector of Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(7), 307–315.
Hanim Tafri, F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Omar, N. (2011). Empirical Evidence on the Risk Management Tools Practised in Islamic and Conventional Banks. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 3(2), 86–104.
IDX. (n.d.).
IIA. (2009). IIA Position Paper: The Role of Internal Auditing in Enterprise-Wide Risk Management.
ISO - The International Organization for Standardization. (2009). ISO 31000:2009 - Risk Management - Principles and Guidelines. ISO 31000:2009.
Khediri, K. Ben, Charfeddine, L., & Youssef, S. Ben. (2015). Islamic versus Conventional Banks in the GCC Countries: A Comparative Study Using Classification Techniques. Research in International Business and Finance, 33(January), 75–98.
Klomp, J., & Haan, J. de. (2012). Banking Risk and Regulation: Does One Size Fit All? Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(12), 3197–3212.
Lundqvist, S. A., & Vilhelmsson, A. (2018). Enterprise Risk Management and Default Risk: Evidence from the Banking Industry. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 8(1), 127–157.
Mallin, C. A. (2016). Corporate Governance. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Mesnard, B, Margerit, A. Power, C and Magnus, M. (2016). Non-performing Loans in the Banking Union: Stocktaking and Challenges. European Parliament, Economic Governenance and Support Unit, (March), 1–11.
Moeller, R. R. (2011). COSO Enterprise Risk Management: Establishing Effective Governance, Risk, and Compliance Processes. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Riandy. (2015). Manajemen Risiko Perbankan Umum dan Perbankan Syariah (Bagian 4-End).
Shafique, O., Hussain, N., & Taimoor Hassan, M. (2013). Differences in the Risk Management Practices of Islamic versus Conventional Financial Institutions in Pakistan: An Empirical Study. Journal of Risk Finance, 14(2), 179–196.
Tschemernjak, R. (2004). Assessing the Regulatory Impact: Credit Risk - Going Beyond Basel II. Balance Sheet, 12(4), 37–41.
Zhang, D., Cai, J., Dickinson, D. G., & Kutan, A. M. (2016). Non-performing Loans, Moral Hazard and Regulation of the Chinese Commercial Banking System. Journal of Banking and Finance, 63(February), 48–60.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Author(s) Rights
As a journal author, you have rights for a large range of uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These Author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in Journal of Islamic Economics and Social Sciences (JIESS) journals have wide rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including use for classroom teaching by Author or Author's institution and presentation at a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; use for internal training by author's company; distribution to colleagues for their research use; use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works; inclusion in a thesis or dissertation; reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgment of final article); preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of final article); voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes (should follow CC by SA License).
Authors can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform or build upon the material, you must redistribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
Copyright Transfer Agreement (for Publishing)
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright publishing of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Journal of Islamic Economics and Social Sciences (JIESS) of Universitas Mercu Buana as Publisher of the journal. Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Copyright Transfer Agreement' (see more information on this). An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a 'Copyright Transfer Agreement' form by the online version of this agreement.
Journal of Islamic Economics and Social Sciences (JIESS) of Universitas Mercu Buana, the Editors and the Advisory Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the Journal of Islamic Economics and Social Sciences (JIESS) are sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
Remember, even though we ask for a transfer of copyright, our journal authors retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights as mention before.
The Copyright Transfer Agreement (CTA) Form can be downloaded here:
[Copyright Transfer Agreement (CTA) Form Journal of Islamic Economics and Social Sciences (JIESS)]
The copyright form should be signed electronically and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original e-mail below:
ournal of Islamic Economics and Social Science (JIESS)
Ikatan Ahli Ekonomi Islam (IAEI)
Komisariat: Universitas Mercu Buana
Faculty of Economic and Business Building
Jl. Raya Meruya Selatan, Kembangan, Jakarta-11650
Telp.021-5840816 Ext. 5342, Fax. 021-5871312
Email: [email protected].
Website: http://publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/jiess
All off articles in the Journal of Islamic Economics and Social Sciences (JIESS) are licensed under CC BY-SA
Journal of Islamic Economics and Social Sciences (JIESS) and the article sare licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
