Comparison of Real Response Modification Factors and Performance of SMRFS Structure with OMRFS Structure Using Pushover Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441/jrs.2023.v12.i1.04Keywords:
Response Modification Value, SMRFS, OMRFS, Structural Performance, Pushover AnalysisAbstract
The value of the earthquake response modification factor ( ) affects the results of the story drift in the SMRSF structure, where the smaller the -value, the larger the deviation and the need for longitudinal reinforcement will be more and more. For structures that do not comply with the SMRSF provisions, in some locations the need for reinforcement is less than that of structures that use the SMRSF provisions. The performance of a structure can be analyzed using the pushover method. The research was conducted with a 4-story and 8-story configuration, with soft soil and medium soil conditions and using SMRSF and OMRSF. From research analysis results, the cross-sectional dimensions of the columns and beams of the ordinary moment building structure system with soft soil type are the largest cross-sectional dimensions compared to the others. Under the provisions of ATC-40, the structure is included in the Damage Control (DC) category level, which means the building is still able to withstand the force of the earthquake, and the risk of fatalities humans are very small. The real -value of the structure with SMRSF is not much different from the in the provisions of SNI 1726:2019.Downloads
References
Arif, F., & Pariatmono, P. 2022. Simulasi Numerik Penggunaan Base Isolation Untuk Struktur Sederhana Tahan Gempa. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7(3), 1163-1174.
ATC-40. 1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete building, vol. 1. Redwood City (USA): Applied Technology Council.
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. 2019. SNI 1726-2019. Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa Untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Non Gedung. Jakarta, Indonesia.
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. 2019. SNI 2847-2019. Persyaratan Beton Struktural Untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Penjelasan. Jakarta, Indonesia.
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. 2020. SNI 1727-2020. Beban Desain Minimum dan Kriteria Terkait Untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur Lain. Jakarta, Indonesia.
Bullen, K. A., & Bolt, B. A. 1985. An introduction to the theory of seismology. Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.11 19/1.1971106
CSI (Computers and Structures Incorporated). 2020. ETABS Ultimate, 64-bit, Versi 18.1.1. [Software]. Barkeley, California, Amerika Serikat. www.csiamerica.com
Dewobroto, W. 2005. Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Baja Tahan Gempa dengan Analisa Pushover. In Civil Engineering National Conference: Sustainability Construction & Structural Engineering Based on Professionalism – Unika Soegijapranata, Semarang (pp. 17-18). Juni. Online access: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=IojiJacAAAAJ&citation_for_view=IojiJacAAAAJ:d1gkVwhDpl0C
FEMA-440. 2005. ‘Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures’, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC.
Geraldi, R., Christianto, D., & Pranata, H. 2019. Evaluasi Struktur Gedung Dengan Sistem Rangka Beton Pemikul Momen Khusus Berbasis Kinerja. JMTS: Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil, 2(2), 115-124. https://doi.org /10.24912/jmts.v2i2.4300
Hasan, R., Xu, L., & Grierson, D. E. 2002. Pushover analysis for performance-based seismic design. Computers & structures, 80(31), 2483-2493. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0045-7949(02)00212-2
Mangoda, N. Z., Sultan, M. A., & Imran, I. 2019. Evaluasi Kinerja Gedung Beton Bertulang Dengan Metode Pushover (Studi Kasus Bangunan Gedung di Ternate). Jurnal Sipil Sains, 9(17). http://dx.doi.org/10.333 87/sipilsains.v9i17.952
Marwanto, Ary, Agus Setiya Budi, and Agus Supriyadi. 2014. ‘Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Gedung 10 Lantai Dengan Analisis Pushover Terhadap Drift dan Displacement Menggunakan Software Etabs’, Jurnal Teknik Sipil, September, 484–91. https://doi.org/10.20961/mateksi.v2i3.37419
Miranda, Eduardo, and Vitelmo V. Bertero. 1994. ‘Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Design’, Earthquake Spectra, 357–79 https://doi.org /10.1193/1.1585778
Mondal, Apurba, Siddhartha Ghosh, dan G. R. Reddy. 2013. ‘Performance-Based Evaluation of the Response Reduction Factor for Ductile RC Frames’, Engineering Structures, 56, 1808–19 https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.038
Muin, R.B. 2010. ‘Nonlinear Response of Soil Structure Interaction due to Cyclic Loading’. The First International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment, 1, 149-156 https://icsbe.uii.ac.id/4th-2016/01/ downloads/archive/2010/ICSBE_2010_Proceedings.pdf
Muin, R.B., & Hidayat, R. 2019. Efek Penggunaan Balok Tidur Terhadap Perilaku Seismik Struktur Gedung Beton Bertulang Berlantai Banyak. https://doi.org/10.22219/ jmts.v17i2.9863
Priyosulistyo, H. 2020. Struktur Beton Bertulang. Gajah Mada University Press: Yogyakarta. Online access: https://ugmpress .ugm.ac.id/userfiles/product/daftar_isi/Perancangan_dan_Analisis_Struktur_Beton_Bertulang_1.pdf
Riantoby, I. K., Budi, A. S., & Purwanto, E. 2014. Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Pada Gedung Bertingkat dengan Analisis Pushover menggunakan Software Etabs (Studi Kasus: Hotel di Wilayah Karanganyar). Matriks Teknik Sipil, 2(1), 116. Online accsess: http://kin.perpusnas. go.id/DisplayData.aspx?pId=186064&pRegionCode=UN11MAR&pClientId=112
Structurepoint. 2017. SP Column Versi 6.0. Investigates columns, shear walls, bridge piers in buildings. Skokie, IL, Amerika Serikat. https://www.structurepoint.org/
Tangahu, B. R., Nur, K. S., & Gani, M. 2019. Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Modifikasi Respon SRPMK Struktur Gedung Beton Bertulang Pada Balok Kategori Desain Seismik D. Jurnal Teknik, 17(1), 57-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.006
Tarbali, K., & Shakeri, K. 2014. Story shear and torsional moment-based pushover procedure for asymmetric-plan buildings using an adaptive capacity spectrum method. Engineering Structures, 79, 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.006
Wardhani, A. S. K., Priyono, P., & Manggala, A. S. 2018. Evaluasi Kapasitas Struktur Gedung Meotel By Dafam Jember Dengan Metode Pushover Analysis. Jurnal Rekayasa Infrastruktur Hexagon, 3(2). https://doi.org /10.32528/hgn.v3i2.2911
Whittaker, A., Hart, G., & Rojahn, C. 1999. Seismic response modification factors. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(4), 438-444. https://doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)07 33-9445(1999)125:4(438)
Yurizka, Hanan, and Anis Rosyidah. 2020. ‘The Performance of Irregular Building Structures Using Pushover Analysis’, Logic: Jurnal Rancang Bangun dan Teknologi. 20.2. 65–72 https://doi.org/10.31940/logic. v20i2.1456
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UMB copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UMB endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
This work is also licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
