SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS METHOD

Authors

  • Dana Santoso School of Graduate Study, Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Arif Mahendra Besral School of Graduate Study, Universitas Mercu Buana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22441/sinergi.2018.1.007

Keywords:

Priority criteria, Analitycal Hierarchy Process, Consistensi Ratio

Abstract

This research was conducted in Hyundai Aluminium Co., Ltd. The company is a manufacturer and applicator for the job, especially aluminium curtain wall installation. Glass materials needed to form a curtain wall unit that these materials are not produced by Hyundai Aluminium Co., Ltd. To the researchers intend to determine the priority criteria, sub-criteria and consistency of thought or opinion of the respondents who are staff at Hyundai Aluminium Co., Ltd. in determining the glass supplier. In this study, the authors use the method of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine the priority of criteria, sub-criteria that compared global priority and will test the level of consistency of answers. The order of importance of criteria on the results of this research is Quality (.290), accuracy of delivery (0.279), price (0.238) and Service (0.193). Sequence global priority sub-criteria are H1 (0.174), K1 (0,138), D1 (0.114), K3 (0.096), H2 (0.063), K2 (0.056), L3 (0.034), D2 (0.025), L2 (0,023), L1 (0.006). Consistensi Value Ratio (CR) among criteria and sub-criteria inter smaller than 0.1 (CR, 0.1) which means that the answers of the respondents consistently.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-28

How to Cite

[1]
D. Santoso and A. M. Besral, “SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS METHOD”, Sinergi, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 37–44, Feb. 2018.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.