INTERPLAY AS A MECHANISM IN CONSTRUCTING ARCHITECTURE: SPATIAL NEGOTIATION IN PUBLIC SPACE OF KOTA TUA JAKARTA

Authors

  • Gaby Fitria Bahri Department of Architecture Universitas Indonesia
  • Kristanti Dewi Paramita Department of Architecture Universitas Indonesia
  • Yandi Andri Yatmo Department of Architecture Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22441/vitruvian.2026.v16i1.009

Keywords:

interplay, system of order, everyday creativity, spatial negotiation, space production.

Abstract

This paper explores the understanding of interplay in architecture as a method of architectural design that negotiates two or more systems of order to generate new possibilities in spatial construction. Public space exists with various order systems that exist in a dominant or resistant way. However, this study argues that new space may exist through creative practice of play that enable interaction between orders. Interplay can be interpreted as a dynamic dialectic between systems of order that enable the construction of new spaces through spatial negotiation. This study explores interplay mechanisms to develop new architectural possibilities. The research was conducted through a case study of public spaces in Kota Tua Jakarta. This case study is selected due to the diverse and interacting systems of order present in the site. The study identifies six types of interplay in the public space: permanent-temporal, dynamic-static, formal-informal, dark-light, old-new, and attract-distract. Each interplay involves spatial operations of overlapping, occupying, spacing, adapting, and appropriation. By employing such approach, this paper offers architecture driven by interplay as a design method that negotiates the boundaries and dichotomies between systems of order, while also encouraging the production of more inclusive and dynamic spaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alam, S., Ahmad, F., Khalid, S., & Shubhi. (2022). Mapping out Liberating Traces of the Fun of Undisciplined Play: A Search for an Alternative Aesthetic in Graffiti. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 13(2), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2022.2.549.564

Baudrillard, J., & Baudrillard, J. (2000). The system of objects (Paperback ed. reprinted). Verso.

Bestari, R., & Fuad, A. H. (2021). Binary spatial negotiation by Street Hawkers. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 673(1), 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/673/1/012043

Certeau, M. de, Giard, L., Mayol, P., & Certeau, M. de. (2014). Living and cooking (L. Giard, Ed.; T. J. Tomasik, Trans.; New revised and augmented edition). University of Minnesota Press.

Certeau, M. de, Rendall, S., & Certeau, M. de. (1984). The practice of everyday life (1. paperback pr., 8. [Repr.]). Univ. of California Press.

Doucet, I., & Frichot, H. (2018). Resist, Reclaim, Speculate: Situated perspectives on architecture and the city. Architectural Theory Review, 22(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2018.1418127

Dovey, K., Pafka, E., & Ristic, M. (Eds.). (2018). Mapping urbanities: Morphologies, flows, possibilities. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Evans, L., & Saker, M. (2019). The playeur and Pokémon Go: Examining the effects of locative play on spatiality and sociability. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918798866

Forty, A. (2004). Words and buildings: A vocabulary of modern architecture (1st paperback edition). Thames & Hudson.

Fuad, A. H., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2017). Urban Picnic: Reaction among actors as spatial mechanism of urban space. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 2(6), 341. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v2i6.939

Gehl, J., Gehl, J., & Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings: Using public space. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Guadalupi, C. (2019, July 9). Reflections on an emerging profession within Tactical Urbanism. Universita Degli Studi Di Torino.

Harani, A. R., Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2023). URBAN KITCHEN: A FORM OF URBAN SYSTEM BASED ON COLLECTIVE OPERATION. JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM, 47(2), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2023.17723

Le Corbusier. (1986). Towards a new architecture. Dover Publications.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.

Papangelis, K., Saker, M., & Jones, C. (2020). Smart Cities at Play: Technology and Emerging forms of playfulness. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(6), 607–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1749338

Tschumi, B. (1999). Architecture and disjunction (Paperback ed., 5. print). MIT Press.

Venturi, R. (with Museum of Modern Art (New York, N.Y.)). (1977). Complexity and contradiction in architecture (2d ed). Museum of Modern Art ; distributed by New York Graphic Society.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-25

How to Cite

1.
Bahri GF, Paramita KD, Yatmo YA. INTERPLAY AS A MECHANISM IN CONSTRUCTING ARCHITECTURE: SPATIAL NEGOTIATION IN PUBLIC SPACE OF KOTA TUA JAKARTA. Vitruvian [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 25 [cited 2026 May 28];16(1):95-104. Available from: https://training-ojs3-publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/virtuvian/article/view/34311

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.