Analisis Perbandingan Server Load Balancing dengan Haproxy & Nginx dalam Mendukung Kinerja Server E- Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441/incomtech.v10i3.8751Kata Kunci:
E-Learning, Haproxy, Load balancing, Nginx,Abstrak
Perkembangan dunia internet terus meningkat. Hal ini terlihat dengan berbagai sistem yang dapat diakses secara online, termasuk implementasi sistem e- learning. Kondisi ini harus didukung dengan infrastruktur server yang memadai. Server harus mampu menangani lonjakan request yang dilakukan setiap user. Oleh karenanya perlu dibangun sistem server dengan memanfaatkan metode load balancing. Sistem load balancing mampu mendistribusikan beban secara merata terhadap masing-masing server yang ada dilingkungannya. Untuk itu perlu dilakukan pengujian terhadap server load balancing yang akan menjadi tumpuan request user sebelum distribusikan ke masing-masing server. Penelitian ini akan melakukan pengujian terhadap Haproxy dan Nginx dengan melakukan pengukuran terhadap dua variable yakni throughput dan response time. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan implementasi load balancing dengan Haproxy memiliki nilai response time sebesar 585 ms lebih kecil dengan Nginx yang memiliki waktu response time 1180,58 ms pada uji koneksi 300/300 sec. Sedangkan untuk nilai throughput load balancing dengan Haproxy juga menunjukkan kinerja yang lebih baik dengan nilai sebesar 896,48 Kb/s lebih besar dibandingkan dengan Nginx yang berada pada angka 848,52 Kb/s pada uji koneksi 300/300 sec. Berdasarkan pengujian yang telah dilakukan, penerapan load balancing dengan Haproxy lebih baik dibandingkan dengan Nginx.
Unduhan
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UMB copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UMB endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
