Developing an Industrial Sustainability Strategy Model Through Exploratory Factor Analysis and DEMATEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441/ijiem.v7i1.36294Kata Kunci:
SBSC, Sustainability, Industry, DEMATEL, Enviromental performanceAbstrak
Corporate awareness of sustainability has increased significantly alongside growing stakeholder expectations for environmentally responsible practices. The industrial sector’s GDP growth in 2023 was accompanied by higher CO₂ emissions, emphasizing the need for a managerial approach that integrates economic, social, and environmental dimensions. This study develops a strategy map based on the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC) by identifying key sustainability performance indicators. Using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), 18 indicators were obtained and grouped into four perspectives: Learning and Growth (3 indicators), Internal Business Processes (8), Stakeholders (3), and Financial (4). The Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method was then applied to examine causal relationships. Results highlight “green technology innovation,” “energy efficiency and renewable energy practices,” and “green corporate image” as the most influential indicators. The Internal Business Process perspective was identified as the primary driver of sustainability performance. These findings stress the importance of aligning strategies with operational improvements to achieve balanced economic and environmental outcomes.Unduhan
Referensi
Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.
Bekker, J. G., Craig, I. K., & Pistorius, P. C. (1999). Modeling and Simulation of Arc Furnace Process. ISIJ International, 39(1), 23–32.
Bezuidenhout, J. J., Eksteen, J. J., & Bradshaw, S. M. (2009). Computational fluid dynamic modelling of an electric furnace used in the smelting of PGM containing concentrates. Minerals Engineering, 22(11), 995–1006.
Bhaktavatsalam, A. K., & Choudhury, R. (1995). Specific Energy Consumption in The Steel Industry. Energy, 20(12), 1247–1250.
Bieker, T., & Waxenberger, B. (2002). Sustainability balanced scorecard and business ethics. Proceedings of the Greening of Industry Network Conference 2002. Gothenburg, Sweden: Greening of Industry Network.
Brown, B. J., Hanson, M. E., Liverman, D. M., & Merideth, R. W. (1987). Global sustainability: Toward definition. Environmental Management, 11(6), 713–719.
Camdali, U., & Tunc, M. (2006). Steady State Heat Transfer of Ladle Furnace During Steel Production Process. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International, 13(3), 18–20.
Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.
Epstein, M.J., & Wisner, P.S. (1996). Using a Balanced Scorecard to implement sustainability. Environmental Quality Management, 11(2), 1–10.
Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard: Linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269–284.
Fridman, A. (2008). Plasma Chemistry (p. 978). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Gazi, F., Atan, T., & Kılıç, M. (2022). The Assessment of Internal Indicators on The Balanced Scorecard Measures of Sustainability. Sustainability, 14(14), 8595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148595
Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874–907.
Hovmand, S. (1995). Fluidized Bed Drying. In Mujumdar, A.S. (Ed.) Handbook of Industrial Drying (pp.195-248). 2nd Ed. New York: Marcel Dekker
Istadi, I. (2006). Development of A Hybrid Artificial Neural Network – Genetic Algorithm for Modelling and Optimization of Dielectric-Barrier Discharge Plasma Reactor. PhD Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Malaysia.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75–85.
Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. (2024). Laporan kinerja Kementerian ESDM tahun 2023. Jakarta, Indonesia: Biro Perencanaan, Kementerian ESDM.
Laurell, H., Karlsson, N. P. E., & Lindgren, P. (2019). Re-testing and validating a triple bottom line dominant logic approach for sustainability. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(5), 1016–1032. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2018-0057
Lee, T.-R. (Jiun-Shen), Lin, K.-H., & Chen, C.-L. (2022). TBL dominant logic for sustainability in oriented marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 40(7), 913–927. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2021-0484
Munilla, L. S., & Miles, S. J. (2005). Stakeholder theory and sustainability integration: Exploring the shifting corporate logic.
Perrini, F., & Tencati, A. (2006). Sustainability and stakeholder management: The need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(5), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.538
Suroso, A. I., Pahan, I., & Tandra, H. (2021). Triple Bottom Line in Indonesia Commercial Palm Oil Business: Sustainability Analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 16(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160210
Trisyulianti, E., Wibisono, D., & Aisyah, A. (2024). Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: Literature Review and Indicator Clustering. Jurnal Manajemen Organisasi, 20(1), 25–40. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jmo/article/view/61691
Wang, J. S. (2022). Sustainable performance evaluation using a green balanced scorecard approach: Evidence from a case in manufacturing. Heliyon, 8(11), e11347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11347
Shooshtarian, S., et al. (2024). Application of the DEMATEL approach to analyse the root causes of building defects. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-01872-3
Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Understanding Applications and Best Practices of DEMATEL: A Method for Prioritizing Key Factors in Multi-Criteria Decision‑Making. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 6(2), 17–23.
Nyimbili, P. H., & Erden, T. (2023). Use of DEMATEL in determining threshold value for interrelationship mapping: threshold derived based on mean of T‑matrix elements. Frontiers in Environmental Economics.
Shooshtarian, S., et al. (2024). Application of the DEMATEL approach to analyse the root causes of building defects. Quality & Quantity, 58(4). Ambang batas α ditentukan dari rata-rata elemen dalam T‑matrix (nilai α = 1.054 dalam studi tersebut).
Hansen, E. G., & Schaltegger, S. (2016). The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(2), 193–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2340-3
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard—Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.
Nurcahyo, R., Pustiwari, S., & Gabriel, D. S. (2018). Developing a strategy map based on sustainability balanced scorecard framework for manufacturing industry in Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 48–51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325904410
Sadler, B. (1990). Sustainable development and water resource management. Alternatives, 17(3), 14–24.
Samiun, A. A., & Damau, U. O. (2024). Evaluation of Corporate Sustainability Performance through the Integration of ESG and Balanced Scorecard in Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia. West Science Accounting and Finance, 2(2), 321–328. https://wsj.westscience-press.com/index.php/wsaf/article/view/1096
Schaltegger, S., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2011). Business cases for sustainability: The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2011.041949
Trisyulianti, E., Wibisono, D., & Aisyah, A. (2024). Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: Literature Review and Indicator Clustering. Jurnal Manajemen Organisasi, 20(1), 25–40. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jmo/article/view/61691
United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (2021). Green Industry Platform: Paper Sector Pathways Toward Sustainability. Vienna: UNIDO. https://www.unido.org
WCED. (1987). Our common future (p. 400). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UMB copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UMB endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
