Determining priority criteria for industry 4.0 maturity models in small and medium enterprises in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441/oe.2023.v15.i3.089Keywords:
industry 4.0, small and medium enterprises (SMEs), criteria, maturity model, Fuzzy DEMATELAbstract
For manufacturing companies, especially Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), currently measuring the level of the Maturity Model (MM) is not an easy thing to do, because there are still many obstacles, including not knowing what factors are priorities in developing the MM. This research aims to identify the criteria that influence the measurement of maturity model based on survey results in small and medium enterprises. Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL method to find the priority and causality of each criterion attribute. The research results show that the Advanced IT criteria is the first priority to be considered to have the most influence on measuring the industry 4.0 maturity model.
Downloads
References
Balog, A., Băjenaru, L., & Cristescu, I. (2019). Analyzing the factors affecting the quality of IoT-based smart wearable devices using the DANP method. Studies in Informatics and Control, 28(4), 431-442.
Elmaallam, M., & Kriouile, A. (2011). Towards a model of maturity for is risk management. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 3(4), 171-188.
Gabus, A., and Fontela, E.. (1973) Perceptions of the World Problematique: Communication Procedure, Communicating with those Bearing Collective Responsibility (DEMATEL Report No. 1). Switzerland. Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Centre.
Gao, H., Ju, Y., Gonzalez, E. D. S., Zeng, X. J., Dong, P., & Wang, A. (2021). Identifying critical causal criteria of green supplier evaluation using heterogeneous judgements: An integrated approach based on cloud model and DEMATEL. Applied Soft Computing, 113, 107882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107882
Han, Y., & Deng, Y. (2018). An enhanced fuzzy evidential DEMATEL method with its application to identify critical success factors. Soft computing, 22, 5073-5090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3311-x
Hu, H. Y., Chiu, S. I., Cheng, C. C., & Yen, T. M. (2011). Applying the IPA and DEMATEL models to improve the order-winner criteria: A case study of Taiwan’s network communication equipment manufacturing industry. Expert systems with applications, 38(8), 9674-9683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.147
Jiao, J., Wei, M., Yuan, Y., &Zhao, T. (2019). Risk quantification and analysis of coupled factors based on the DEMATEL model and a bayesian network. Applied Sciences, 10(1), 317. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010317
Jindal, A., Sharma, S. K., Sangwan, K. S., & Gupta, G. (2021). Modelling supply chain agility antecedents using fuzzy DEMATEL . Procedia CIRP, 98, 436-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.130
Kagermann, H., Lukas, W. D., & Wahlster, W. (2011). Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. industriellen Revolution. VDI nachrichten, 13(1), 2-3. Retrieved from http://www.vdi-nachrichten.com/Technik-Gesellschaft/Industrie-40- Mit
Kearney, A. (2018). Readiness for the future of production report 2018. In World Economic Forum: Cologny, Switzerland.
Kementerian Perindustrian (2018). Indonesia’s Fourth Industrial Revolution Making Indonesia-Making Indonesia 4.0. Kementerian Perindustrian, 24-27.
Khan, S., Maqbool, A., Haleem, A., & Khan, M. I. (2020). Analyzing critical success factors for a successful transition towards circular economy through DANP approach. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(3), 505-529. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-09-2019-0191
Lee, J., Lee, D., & Kang, S. (2007, June). An overview of the business process maturity model (BPMM). In Asia-Pacific Web Conference (pp. 384-395). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72909-9_42
Lin, Y. T., Yang, Y. H., Kang, J. S., & Yu, H. C. (2011). Using DEMATEL method to explore the core competences and causal effect of the IC design service company: An empirical case study. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 6262-6268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.092
Musyarofah, S. A., Tontowi, A. E., Masruroh, N. A., & Wibowo, B. S. (2022). Comparative Study of Industry 4.0 Readiness Measurement of Indonesian Companies: INDI 4.0, IMPULS and SIRI. In Proceedings of the 1st Australian Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Sydney, Australia, available at: https://index.ieomsociety.org/index.cfm/article/view/ID/12109
Pan, J. N., & Nguyen, H. T. N. (2015). Achieving customer satisfaction through product–service systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.018
Pessl, E., Sorko, S. R., & Mayer, B. (2017). Roadmap Industry 4.0–implementation guideline for enterprises. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 5(6), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14
Proença, D., & Borbinha, J. (2018). Maturity models for data and information management: A state of the art. In Digital Libraries for Open Knowledge: 22nd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, TPDL 2018, Porto, Portugal, September 10–13, 2018, Proceedings 22 (pp. 81-93). Springer International Publishing.
Qin, J., Crowston, K., & Kirkland, A. (2014). A Capability Maturity Model for Research Data Management.
Rockwell Automation. (2014). The connected enterprise maturity model. Rockwell Automation, 12, 1-12.
Rolling Meadows, I. T. (2005). Cobit 4.0: control objectives, management guidelines, maturity models. IT Governance Institute.
Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016). A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia Cirp, 52, 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040
Shieh, J. I., Wu, H. H., & Huang, K. K. (2010). A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(3), 277-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.01.013
Si, S. L., You, X. Y., Liu, H. C., & Zhang, P. (2018). DEMATEL technique: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on methodologies and applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3696457
Stanford University. (2016). Data Governance Maturity Model. from http://web.stanford.edu/dept/pres-provost/cgi-bin/dg/wordpress/
Zhou, Q., Huang, W., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Identifying critical success factors in emergency management using a fuzzy DEMATEL method. Safety science, 49(2), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.08.005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UMB copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UMB endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
