Strategi Penentuan Supplier untuk Mitigasi Dampak Kenaikan Harga Bahan Baku pada Industri Manufaktur Baja lapis seng
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441/oe.2022.v14.i1.038Kata Kunci:
supplier selection, MCDM, manufacturing, steel, galvanizing, AHPAbstrak
According to the concept of supply chain management, one of the possible solutions for mutual survival in a turbulent world market is chain cooperation among the producer, his suppliers, and customers. The problem of supplier selection and determination of material quantities supplied is one of the most important activities in the supply chain. The purpose of this research is to propose a model for supplier selection for Cold Rolled Coil (CRC) supply by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), based on decision-making criteria validated by experts in the galvanizing industry. This study found that for galvanizing industry the weight of importance of Cost, Quality, Product, Service, and Delivery criteria is 0.47, 0.19, 0.19, 0.07, and 0.07, respectively. Supplier ranking based on their importance to the industry’s purpose has also been found, which would assist the decision-making process in determining CRC suppliers.Unduhan
Referensi
Akbar, P.G., Henmaidi, H., & Amrina, E. (2016). Usulan Indikator Evaluasi Pemasok dalam Penetapan Bidder List: Studi Kasus Pengadaan Jasa PT. Semen Padang. Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri, 14(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.25077/josi.v14.n1.p39-54.2015
Abdillah, Y. & Hasibuan, S. (2021), Supplier selection decision making in the pharmaceutical industry based on Kraljic portfolio and MAUT method: A Case Study in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Singapore, March 7-11, 2021
Bakhtiar, A. (2017). Analisis Bobot Pemilihan Supplier Bahan Bakar Minyak Untuk Kapal Pengangkut Batubara Dengan Metode Analytic Hierarcy Process. Operations Excellence, 9(3), 271–281.
BSN. (2015). Sistem Manajemen Mutu - Persyaratan (ISO 9001:2015, IDT).
Çakır, S. (2017). Selecting the best supplier at a steel-producing company under fuzzy environment. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 88(5–8), 1345–1361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8861-4
Clark, V.L.P., Huddleston-Casas, C.A., Churchill, S.L., Green, D.O.N., & Garrett, A. L. (2008). Mixed methods approaches in family science research. Journal of Family Issues, 29(11), 1543–1566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08318251
Creswell & Creswell, J.D., J.W. (2017). Research design Research design. In Research in Social Science: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Issue September). file:///E:/Documents/dosen/buku Metodologi/[John_W._Creswell]_Research_Design_Qualitative,_Q(Bookos.org).pdf
Dudhe, N., Chauhan, S. S., & Yadav, A. (2013). Selection of Supply Chain Partner For Coke Energy Ltd. India using Combined AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process)-WSM (weighted sum model) Approach. Ijesrt International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 2(7), 1–9.
Dweiri, F., Kumar, S., Khan, S.A., & Jain, V. (2016). Designing an integrated AHP-based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 62, 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.030
Emec, S. (2019). An Integrated MCDM for a Medical Company Selection in Health Sector. International Journal of Scientific and Technological Research, 5(4), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.7176/JSTR/5-4-09
Gholipour, R., Jandaghi, G., & Rajaei, R. (2014). Contractor selection in MCDM context using fuzzy AHP. Contractor Selection in MCDM Context Using Fuzzy AHP, 7(1), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijms.2014.36206
Govindan, K., Mangla, S.K., & Luthra, S. (2017). Prioritising indicators in improving supply chain performance using fuzzy AHP: insights from the case example of four Indian manufacturing companies. Production Planning & Control, 28(6–8), 552–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1309716
Hajar, Y.A.A. (2017). Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Build Suppliers’ Selection Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(12), 772–787. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i12/2552
Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2011). Operations Management (12th ed.). PEARSON.
Hruška, R., Průša, P., & Babić, D. (2014). The Use of AHP Method For Selection of Supplier. Transport, 29(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2014.930928
Jain, N., & Singh, A. R. (2018). Supplier Selection in Indian Iron and Steel Industry : An Integrated MCDM Approach. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118(20), 455–459.
Jounio, C. (2013). Supplier Selection Based on AHP Method- Supplier from China for Suomen Koristetuonti. Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences. http://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/60479/Thesis final version 2_Chengjing Jounio.pdf?sequence=1
Kurniawan, R., Sawarni Hasibuan, & Rosalendro Eddy Nugroho. (2017). Analisis Kriteria Dan Proses Seleksi Kontraktor Chemical Sektor Hulu Migas: Aplikasi Metode Delphi-Ahp . Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, VII(2), 154538. https://mix.mercubuana.ac.id/id/publications/154538/
Luzon, B., & El-Sayegh, S. M. (2016). Evaluating supplier selection criteria for oil and gas projects in the UAE using AHP and Delphi. International Journal of Construction Management, 16(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2016.1146112
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., MD Nor, K., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., & Valipour, A. (2015). Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 516–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139
Muhendra, H., & Hasibuan, S. (2018). Seleksi Sub-Kontraktor Proyek Konstruksi Jalan Layang. Jurnal Manajemen Transportasi & Logistik, 5(1), 43-54.
Patel, D., & Thakar, G. (2021). A Sector Wise Prioritization of Vendor Selection in Supply Chain using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method. International Journal of Computer Applications, 174(18), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2021921073
Perić, T., Babić, Z., & Veža, I. (2013). Vendor selection and supply quantities determination in a bakery by AHP and fuzzy multi-criteria programming. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 26(9), 816–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2013.799778
Pourjavad, E., & Shahin, A. (2020). Green supplier development programs selection: a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 13(6), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2020.1773569
Ramayanti, G., & Ulum, H. (2017). Sistem Penentuan Supplier Kawat Las Dengan Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Jurnal Sistem Dan Manajemen Industri, 1(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.30656/jsmi.v1i1.166
Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
Sadeghi, J., Mousavi, S.M., & Niaki, S.T.A. (2016). Optimizing an inventory model with fuzzy demand, backordering, and discount using a hybrid imperialist competitive algorithm. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(15–16), 7318–7335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.03.013
Sambudi, E. A. (2019). Analisa pemilihan supplier dengan metode Analytic Hierarchy Process: Kasus Perusahaan Otomotif di Sunter. Operations Excellence: Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering, 11(3), 322. https://doi.org/10.22441/oe.v11.3.2019.040
Sharma, D.G., & Rawani, A.M. (2016). Green Supplier Selection for Indian Cement Industry: AHP-based approach. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(4), 2368–2373. www.irjet.net
Steelbenchmarker. (2021). Price History Tables and Charts USA China Western Europe World Export. www.steelbenchmarker.com
Wang, C.N., Tsai, H.-T., Ho, T.P., Nguyen, V.T., & Huang, Y.F. (2020). Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Model for Supplier Evaluation and Selection for Oil Production Projects in Vietnam. Processes, 8(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8020134
Zolfani, S.H., Chen, I.-S., Rezaeiniya, N., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2012). A Hybrid MCDM Model Enccompassing AHP and Copras-G Methods for Selecting Company Suppliers in Iran. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(3), 529–543. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.709472
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UMB copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UMB endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
