Analisa Aspek Kualitatif Pemilihan Kontraktor Untuk Pekerjaan Renovasi/Perbaikan Gedung Bersejarah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441/jrs.2021.v10.i2.01Keywords:
Gedung bersejarah, Kontraktor, Perbaikan Gedung Bersejarah, Variabel, Variabel DominanAbstract
Pemilihan kontraktor yang tepat menjadi salah satu penentu keberhasilan proyek kontruksi gedung baik gedung modern maupun gedung bersejarah.. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa kriteria pemilihan kontraktor gedung bersejarah dan kriteria dominan yang menjadi pertimbangan para pemilik gedung. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini terdapat 13 kriteria pemilihan kontraktor untuk pekerjaan perbaikan gedung bersejarah dan terdapat 3 variabel yang dominan. Penelitian ini bermanfaat bagi pemilik Gedung bersejarah, pemerintah dan kalangan
Downloads
References
REFERENSI
Fauziyah, S., Wibowo, M. A., & Suliantoro, H. (2016). Analisis Perbandingan Kontrak Tradisional dan Kontrak Berbasis Kinerja (KBK) Berdasarkan Risiko Persepsi Kontraktor dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil, 22(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.14710/mkts.v22i1.12402
Fredheim, L. H., & Khalaf, M. (2016). The significance of values: heritage value typologies re-examined. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(6), 466–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2016.1171247
Hartono, W., Nurhidayah, L., & Sugiyarto. (2016). Pemilihan Rekanan Jasa Konstruksi
/ Kontraktor Dengan Metode Ahp ( Studi Kasus Pengadaan Di Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS). Matriks Teknik Sipil, IV(1), 8–16.
Indonesia, P. T. V. (2019) Faktor-Faktor Kriteria Pemilihan Kontraktor Yang Contractor Selection Criteria Affecting Project, 39–48.
Kementrian PUPR Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia No.22 Tahun 2018. Peraturan Mentri PUPR, 22(2), https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712107005
Kurniawan, R., Hasibuan, S., & Nugroho, R. E. (2017). Kurniawan At All 252-266 MIX.
Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, VII(2), 252–266.
Morkūnaitė, Ž., & Podvezko, V. (2019). Criteria Evaluation for Contractor Selection in Cultural Heritage Projects Using Multiple Criteria Approach, (May).
Morkūnaitė, Ž., Podvezko, V., & Kutut, V. (2017). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Selection Criteria For Evaluating Contractors Of Cultural Heritage Objects, 00.
M. Tarigan, A., Abdullah, A., & A.Rani, H. (2018). Faktor-Faktor Risiko Design and Build Yang Mempengaruhi Kesuksesan Proyek Rehabilitasi Total Gedung Pendidikan Di Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta. Jurnal Arsip Rekayasa Sipil Dan Perencanaan, 1(2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.24815/jarsp.v1i2.10962
Proyek, P., Di, P., & Sikka, K. (2015). Jurnal Spektran Analysis Of Factors Affecting Winner Selection Of Auction Of Jurnal Spektran, 3(2), 66–74.
Puspitasari, N. B., Rinawati, D. I., & Putra, A. W. (2018). Desain Kriteria Pemilihan Penyedia Jasa Konstruksi Bangunan Menggunakan Metode Evaluasi Dengan Merit Point System. J@ti Undip : Jurnal Teknik Industri, 13(2), 75. https: // doi.org
/10.14710 /jati.13.2.75-82
Runa, I. (2016). KONSERVASI BANGUNAN BERSEJARAH : Studi Kasus Bangunan Peribadatan di Pulau Bali. Undagi, 1–11.
Rachenjantono, E. (2008). Analisa Dan Evaluasi Hukum Tentang Jasa Konstruksi Daftar Isi. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.
Sandika, P., Patradhiani, R., Studi, P., Industri, T., Teknik, F., & Palembang, U. M. (2019). Integrasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri (2019), 4 (1) 1 Analisis Pemilihan Kontraktor Menggunakan Metode, 4, 1–8.
Skitmore, M. (2016). Criteria for contractor selection, (January 1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997373088
Suwandari, Yunita Dian, L. S. R. (2019). Development of Operational Standards for Risk-Based Cultural Heritage Office Building Maintenance Procedures That The Building Safe and Comfortable to use ( Study Case Heritage Office Building PT . X ) Civil Engineer. Journal of International Conference Proceedings, 1(2).
The material supply chain management in a construction project : A current scenario in the procurement process The material supply chain management in a construction project : A current scenario in the procurement process. (2018), (October). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5062675
“UU No 11 Tahun 2010 Tentang Cagar Budaya.” 2010. 5(2010): 265–88.
Wateno Oetomo (2015). Kajian Terhadap Resiko Kualitas Hubungan Kontraktual Antara Kontraktor Dan Subkontraktor Berkaitan Dengan Pekerjaan Spesialis Pada Proyek Konstruksi, Jurnal TeknikSipil Untag Surabaya Juli 2015, Vol. 8 No. 1, hal. 95 – 104
Y.K. (2012). Risks in conservation projects. Journal of Design + Built, 5(No. 1), 1–10. https://doi.org/ISSN: 1985-6881
Zolkafli, U. K., Zakaria, N., Yahya, Z., Ali, A. S., Wajdi, F., Othman, M., & Hock, Y. K. (2012). Risks in conservation projects. Journal of Design + Built, 5(No. 1), 1–10. https://doi.org/ISSN: 1985-6881
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UMB copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UMB endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
This work is also licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
